Monday, February 24, 2025, 12:25AM |  37°
MENU
Advertisement
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection is seeking a civil penalty from Downtown-based EQT Corp. for a 2012 incident that contaminated waterways and groundwater at a well site in Duncan, Tioga County.
1
MORE

Pa. Supreme Court hears case over fracking pit leak, could limit water pollution fines

Pennsylvania DEP

Pa. Supreme Court hears case over fracking pit leak, could limit water pollution fines

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania’s high court will decide whether the penalties in the state’s stream protection law apply only to discrete spills or also to the spreading contamination that follows after leaks are stopped, a distinction that could mean a difference of millions of dollars for companies facing pollution fines.

The state Supreme Court justices heard arguments Tuesday in what an attorney for the Department of Environmental Protection told them is the most important environmental case to come before their court in recent years.

The lower Commonwealth Court ruled in January that fines for spills into streams and groundwater must be based on the duration of the initial release and not on the days pollution flows through waterways — siding with Downtown-based EQT Corp. and rejecting state environmental regulators’ longstanding practice for calculating penalties.

Advertisement

EQT filed the case to challenge DEP’s proposed fine for a leak in a 6-million-gallon fracking wastewater holding pond at a Marcellus Shale drilling site in Tioga County in 2012 that caused widespread and persistent pollution.

Jonathan Massey, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney who was brought in to represent the DEP, told the court that the state Clean Streams Law’s text, history and purpose all indicate the Legislature’s broad interest in preventing and promptly cleaning up pollution by allowing for penalties for ongoing violations.

At the same time, the limits on DEP’s authority are substantial, he said, and include the fact that the state Environmental Hearing Board — not the Department of Environmental Protection — imposes penalties based on scientific evidence in cases when settlements can’t be reached.

Robert Byer, an attorney for EQT, said the law does not prescribe mounting fines for as long as any trace of pollution remains. Other laws and resources allow DEP to ensure spills are stopped, including the agency’s ability to issue cleanup orders or seek damages, he said.

Advertisement

Most of the justices’ questions during the session were aimed at clarifying the two sides’ positions.

Justice Max Baer asked Mr. Massey if “for every yard” a spill travels down a river, “is that another infraction?” (Mr. Massey’s answer was no, it would be a new violation when contamination moves from groundwater to a seep to a stream.)

Justice Baer later asked Mr. Byer to consider the example of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska as a one-day rupture in the tanker ship that created an environmental disaster.

“Under your interpretation,” he said, “it would be a $10,000 fine.” Mr. Byer agreed, but said it is for the Legislature to change the law if it wants fines to cover pollution that remains in waterways.

The state Environmental Hearing Board assessed a $1.1 million fine against EQT in May for the wastewater pond leak, which amounted to a quarter of the financial penalty that DEP recommended. Both DEP and EQT have appealed the penalty ruling.

Laura Legere: llegere@post-gazette.com. 

First Published: November 28, 2017, 10:01 p.m.

RELATED
SHOW COMMENTS (0)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
Protesters gathered at the corner of Murray and Forbes avenues to speak out against the Trump administration's policies on Sunday, Feb. 23, 2025, in Squirrel Hill.
1
news
'We will fight back': Hundreds rally in Squirrel Hill in opposition of Trump, Musk and president's administration
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA - FEBRUARY 23: Joel Blomqvist #30 of the Pittsburgh Penguins stands in the crease as the New York Rangers celebrate a goal by Adam Fox #23 in the third period during the game at PPG PAINTS Arena on February 23, 2025 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Justin Berl/Getty Images)
2
sports
Goaltending woes cost the Penguins again as they fall to rival Rangers
Pirates starting pitcher Mitch Keller warms up in the outfield befiore their first home game of the Grapefruit League season at LECOM Park in Bradenton, Florida, on Sunday, Feb. 23, 2025.
3
sports
3 takeaways from Pirates’ second straight win to start spring training
Egg prices are on the rise because of avian flu and inflation.
4
life
What’s up with eggs, and why are they so expensive?
The University of Pittsburgh's Cathedral of Learning
5
business
Amid funding uncertainty, Pitt pauses doctoral admissions
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection is seeking a civil penalty from Downtown-based EQT Corp. for a 2012 incident that contaminated waterways and groundwater at a well site in Duncan, Tioga County.  (Pennsylvania DEP)
Pennsylvania DEP
Advertisement
LATEST business
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story