Sunday, February 23, 2025, 2:19AM |  32°
MENU
Advertisement
1
MORE

Map of confusion: Pa. Supreme Court overreached, but it’s now law 

Map of confusion: Pa. Supreme Court overreached, but it’s now law 

Pennsylvania Republicans were right to challenge the new congressional map imposed by the state Supreme Court last month. The state’s high court usurped the role of the Legislature in composing boundaries for legislative districts for the U.S House of Representatives. It was a bad move that will have consequences down the line.

But after Monday’s dual actions at the federal level — a panel of three U.S. District Court judges dismissed the appeal, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to intervene — the Republicans are also right to put the fight aside for now. The prospect of the May 15 primaries in a new world of districts should concentrate the mind.

To review the action: On Jan. 22, the state Supreme Court correctly ruled that the state’s congressional district map “clearly, plainly and palpably violates” the state constitution. Drawn in 2011 by the Republican-controlled Legislature, the map was a high achievement in the cynical but age-old craft of gerrymandering — drawing congressional districts so contorted that some looked like cartoon characters. Pennsylvania Democrats argued that the twisted boundaries put them at a serious disadvantage. Only five of the 18 congressional seats were held by Democrats, which didn’t reflect vote totals statewide.

Advertisement

The state Supreme Court, however, set improbable conditions. It ordered the Legislature to redraw the map by Feb. 9 and the governor to approve it by Feb. 15 — or else the court would impose its own. As expected, Gov. Tom Wolf didn’t like the Republicans’ map. On Feb. 19, the court handed down a map that it created with the guidance of a Stanford University law professor. Across the nation, Democrats cheered. Most analysts predict that the party will pick up at least three seats in the midterm elections.

At a glance, the new map looks reasonable. The districts are compact and contiguous. But the whiff of political influence remains.

The state Supreme Court is composed of five Democrats and two Republicans. The decision to impose the map was 4-3. The two dissenting Republicans were joined by Justice Max Baer, a Democrat who has been a voice of reason throughout. He agreed that the 2011 map was flawed, but that the greater ill was rushing a map through. He believed that the state could tolerate another election under the map. “The Court’s remedy threatens the separation of powers ... by failing to allow our sister branches sufficient time to legislate a new congressional districting map,” he wrote in a dissent, “and foments unnecessary confusion in the current election cycle.”

Confusion now abounds. Candidates are scrambling to run in the newfangled districts, leaving voters scratching their heads.

Advertisement

The thing about politics, however, is that all the number-crunching in the world doesn’t determine the outcome. Democrats, Republicans and third-party candidates have to get out there and earn the vote amid the swirl of influences. “I think we’re accepting the decision,” said state Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, a Republican from Centre County. “[We] don’t like it, but that’s life and we move on.”

The more important point is that the excesses of gerrymandering have been matched by judicial overreach. Usurpation of power can cut both ways. The Democrats who are so pleased with the ruling should realize that the state Supreme Court, at some point, will return to a Republican majority. Will they stay silent if that court hands down a politically tainted decision? Rep. Cris Dush, a Republican from Jefferson County, introduced legislation to impeach the four Democratic justices who voted to impose the new map. His bill will probably fade away, but it’s a measure of the resentment that legislating from the bench can breed.

First Published: March 23, 2018, 4:00 a.m.

RELATED
SHOW COMMENTS (0)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
York County District Attorney Timothy J. Barker reacts during a news conference regarding the shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York, Pa. on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
1
news
Police officer killed, gunman dead in shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York
The University of Pittsburgh's Cathedral of Learning
2
business
Amid funding uncertainty, Pitt pauses doctoral admissions
Elon Musk told federal workers Saturday that they must respond to an email by summarizing their accomplishments for the week, repeating a tactic he used to cull the workforce at his social media company.
3
news
Elon Musk gives all federal workers 48 hours to explain what they did last week
Pirates outfielder DJ Stewart gets congratulations from teammates after his home run against the Baltimore Orioles in the first game of the Grapefruit League season at Ed Smith Stadium in Sarasota, Fla., on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
4
sports
5 takeaways from Pirates' spring training victory over Orioles
Preston Coleman, 52, was beaten and strangled inside an Aliquippa VFW on Jan. 5, 2025, in what police described as a vicious, unprovoked attack.
5
news
Bartender working at Aliquippa VFW during beating that left man unconscious facing charges
Advertisement
LATEST opinion
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story