Sunday, February 23, 2025, 10:48AM |  27°
MENU
Advertisement

Out of order: Superior Court raps Judge McDaniel on sentences

Out of order: Superior Court raps Judge McDaniel on sentences

While it is not easy to feel sympathy for those convicted of sex crimes, their legal rights must be respected like everyone else’s. The state Superior Court demonstrated this principle last week in a sharp opinion ordering the resentencing of a man who pleaded guilty to sexual offenses involving his siblings. 

The court ruled that the sentence imposed on the defendant — identified only as A.S. to protect the victims’ privacy — was too severe. But it also signaled its concern about a “possible emerging  pattern” of overly harsh sentencing of sex offenders by Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Donna Jo McDaniel. This was a clear admonishment to Judge McDaniel and a reminder of the need for trial judges to follow sentencing guidelines and hew to the facts of a case.

Standard sentencing guidelines called for A.S. to receive 3 to 12 months of imprisonment in one case and 36 to 54 months in a second. Instead, Judge McDaniel sentenced him to 30 to 60 months in the first case and 60 to 120 months in the second. She based the sentences on what the appellate court called a misapplication of the judicial record. For example, she said A.S. had previous offenses, a statement not substantiated by the evidence, and sought psychiatric help only after his arrest, when the opposite was true. He went to a hospital seeking treatment for mental illness and admitted his crimes, triggering the investigation.

Advertisement

In a footnote to its order regarding A.S., the Superior Court also expressed concern about another defendant, Gabino Bernal. Twice, Bernal appealed the sentences Judge McDaniel gave him for sex offenses, and each time, the appellate court vacated punishments it considered too harsh and told Judge McDaniel to try again. His lawyers have cited more than a dozen other cases in which Judge McDaniel purportedly treated defendants with a questionably heavy hand.

As the Superior Court noted, trial judges have the discretion to mete out punishments that fall short of or exceed the standard sentencing guidelines. Nevertheless, these should be the exception,  not the rule, and each exception should be substantiated by the facts of the case. In the cases involving A.S., the Superior Court found, the threshold for imposing sentences above the standard range was not met. Rather, the court said, a sentence below the standard range might even have been appropriate.

Standard sentencing guidelines are important for various reasons. First, they reflect society’s consensus about the punishment fitting the crime. Second, they promote consistency, which is integral to the concept of equal justice under the law. If Judge McDaniel considers the penalties for certain crimes too soft, she should lobby the Legislature to change them. She should not try to legislate from the bench.

The order to resentence A.S. underscores the fundamental importance of appellate courts, which exist not only to ensure the fair adjudication of disputes between private parties and between private parties and the government but to make sure judges toe the line, too. In the courthouse, if nowhere else, every person should get a fair shake.

Advertisement

First Published: January 19, 2017, 5:00 a.m.

RELATED
SHOW COMMENTS  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
The University of Pittsburgh's Cathedral of Learning
1
business
Amid funding uncertainty, Pitt pauses doctoral admissions
Pirates outfielder DJ Stewart gets congratulations from teammates after his home run against the Baltimore Orioles in the first game of the Grapefruit League season at Ed Smith Stadium in Sarasota, Fla., on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
2
sports
5 takeaways from Pirates' spring training victory over Orioles
A new report advises retirees in 2025 to aim for just 3.7% when withdrawing from savings -- down from 4%. Over a 30-year retirement, that could mean the difference between financial security or outliving your cash in your 80s or 90s, financial experts say.
3
business
How much can retirees safely withdraw from their nest eggs? Financial experts weigh in.
York County District Attorney Timothy J. Barker reacts during a news conference regarding the shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York, Pa. on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
4
news
Police officer killed, gunman dead in shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York
Preston Coleman, 52, was beaten and strangled inside an Aliquippa VFW on Jan. 5, 2025, in what police described as a vicious, unprovoked attack.
5
news
Bartender working at Aliquippa VFW during beating that left man unconscious facing charges
Advertisement
LATEST opinion
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story