Tuesday, February 25, 2025, 12:34AM |  49°
MENU
Advertisement

Chipping away: Abortion rights are still under attack in the U.S.

Chipping away: Abortion rights are still under attack in the U.S.

The U.S. Supreme Court temporarily blocked a Texas law this month that would close almost all abortion clinics in that state, but Texas is far from alone. Its law is just one of the recent attacks on reproductive freedom across the nation.

In Pennsylvania, Gov. Tom Corbett and the General Assembly approved new regulations for abortion clinics in 2011 ostensibly to improve their standards of operation, but with the happy knowledge that the extra rules would make it more expensive to perform abortions and possibly reduce their number. Such laws threaten to reverse decades of progress on reproductive rights.

The Texas law would require abortion clinics and patients to adhere to onerous standards that have little to do with patient health. An abortion clinic would be required to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles and to upgrade its equipment and staff. None of this is medically necessary.

Advertisement

If the law is allowed to take effect, it will close all but eight of the state’s roughly 40 abortion clinics. More than a quarter of Texas women of childbearing age would have to drive 100 miles or more to gain access to abortion services.

Anti-choice forces in Texas claim the law will protect women’s health. In fact, it will endanger the health of women who are forced to travel long distances and endure long wait times to get the care they need.

Texas’ law reflects the dismal state of abortion rights nationwide. States have authorized Draconian laws that chip away at the right to choose: mandatory waiting periods, mandatory ultrasounds (which often cost $200 to $300) and bans on abortion coverage in health insurance plans.

Laws that impose prohibitive restrictions on women’s right to a safe and legal abortion aren’t just dangerous and unjustified. They’re unconstitutional. The federal justices should strike down Texas’ law and laws like it, but it’s unclear whether the conservative court will do so.

Advertisement

Voters who care about protecting the right to choose must hold lawmakers accountable. Reproductive freedom is not just a women’s issue, but also a social, economic and even family issue. It’s time that elected officials, in Pennsylvania and elsewhere, were reminded that there are consequences for restricting that freedom.

Meet the Editorial Board.

First Published: October 27, 2014, 4:00 a.m.

RELATED
SHOW COMMENTS  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, shown delivering his budget address in early February, said on Monday that a federal freeze of money intended for Pennsylvania is over.
1
news
Gov. Shapiro says federal freeze and blockages of $2.1 billion for Pa. are now over
The Pennsylvania Capitol in Harrisburg, where state Acting Secretary of Education Carrie Rowe on Monday answered budget questions from lawmakers.
2
news
Pa. acting education secretary 'exceptionally concerned' after report on cyber charter school funding
Law enforcement respond to the scene of a shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York, Pa. on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
3
news
Gunman in UPMC mass shooting battled lifelong mental health issues, says ex-girlfriend
Agents took Rachel Marie Powell, 40, of Sandy Lake, into custody in New Castle on Feb. 4, 2021.
4
news
Pardoned for Jan. 6, 'Pink Hat Lady' came home to a new reality in Western Pa.
Law enforcement respond to the scene of a shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
5
business
Pennsylvania hospitals beef up security in wake of York hospital shootings
Advertisement
LATEST opinion
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story