Tuesday, January 28, 2025, 12:55PM |  36°
MENU
Advertisement

Paul Krugman: Tax reform vs. the Little People

Paul Krugman: Tax reform vs. the Little People

According to news reports, Donald Trump wanted the House Republican tax “reform” bill to be called the Cut Cut Cut Act. Alas, he didn’t get his wish, and it was instead given a boring name nobody can remember. There’s still time to change it! Let me propose, as one reader suggested, that it be renamed the Leona Helmsley Act, after the New York hotelier convicted of tax evasion, who famously declared that “only the little people pay taxes.”

That, after all, is the main thrust of the bill. It hugely favors the wealthy over the middle class, which is pretty much always true of Republican proposals. But it’s not just about favoring high incomes: It also systematically favors people who live off their assets, especially inherited wealth, over the little people — that is, poor shlubs who actually have to work for a living.

To get an idea why, consider four hypothetical taxpayers and how they would fare under the GOP bill.

Advertisement

First is the poster child family Paul Ryan keeps talking about, a family with two children making $59,000 a year. In the first year of the Cut Cut Cut Act, such a family would indeed receive a tax cut. But this cut comes from several special tax credits that are basically loss leaders to help sell the plan; they all either expire in later years or will get eroded by inflation. By 2027, with the plan fully phased in, that exemplary family would actually be facing a significant tax increase relative to current law.

Second, consider someone who is much further up the scale but still works for a living. In the movie “Wall Street,” Gordon Gekko sneers at “a $400,000-a-year working Wall Street stiff flying first class and being comfortable.” What would happen to that guy? Well, I’ve done some back-of-the envelope calculations: If you ignore deductions, he’d end up paying a few hundred dollars less in taxes. But once you take lost deductions into account, especially reduced deductions for state and local taxes, he almost certainly ends up facing a tax hike, not a cut.

And of course it’s not just Wall Street stiffs who would find themselves in that situation: So would doctors, lawyers, engineers and other well-paid professionals. Overall, the Tax Policy Center estimates that more than a quarter of the population would see taxes go up, not down, under the GOP proposal; for those with incomes between $200,000 and $500,000, that fraction rises to more than 40 percent.

But what about owners of small businesses? Under current law, their business income is “passed through” to their personal income, and taxed accordingly. The Cut Cut Cut Act would instead allow people with such income to pay only 25 percent, a big tax break for those with high incomes. But this raises obvious possibilities for abuse, with every well-paid professional reclassifying herself or himself as a business.

Advertisement

To limit these abuses, the GOP bill imposes rules that basically limit the 25 percent rate to “passive” income recipients. That is, you get the full tax break only if you own a business but don’t, you know, actually run it.

Finally, let’s imagine a very lucky individual — let’s arbitrarily call him Eric Trump — who stands to inherit a stake in a business he doesn’t run, plus a bunch of stock. He’ll get his inheritance tax-free, because the estate tax gets phased out in the GOP bill. He’ll get to pay a low tax rate on his business income. And his stocks will pay higher dividends, because the GOP bill also sharply cuts corporate tax rates, and most of the benefit of those cuts will probably flow to shareholders.

So when Gary Cohn, Mr. Trump’s top economic adviser, says the bill’s goal is “to deliver middle-class tax cuts to the hardworking families in this country,” he’s claiming that up is down and black is white. This bill does little or nothing for the middle class, and even among the affluent it’s biased against those who work hard in favor of the idle rich.

Also let’s not forget that tax increases on working Americans are only part of the story. This bill would also, according to the Congressional Budget Office, add $1.7 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. If this bill or anything like it passes, Republicans will immediately revert to their previous pretense of being deficit hawks and start demanding spending cuts.

Since federal spending is dominated by programs — Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid — that benefit the middle and working classes, the end result of this tax bill would be to leave most working Americans, even those who wouldn’t face direct tax increases, worse off, all for the benefit of a tiny minority, especially those who haven’t even worked for their wealth.

You might wonder how Republicans imagine that they can get away with this.  First, they will lie, unashamedly, about what their bill actually does. Second, they will try to distract working-class voters by stoking racial animosity. That didn’t work too well in Tuesday’s elections, but they’ll keep on trying.

Paul Krugman is a New York Times columnist.

First Published: November 11, 2017, 5:00 a.m.

RELATED
Comments Disabled For This Story
Partners
Advertisement
The neighborhood of Beechview is photographed on Thursday, Dec. 10, 2020. Tensions are high in that community and others in Western Pennsylvania as President Donald Trump's administration ramps up Immigration & Customs Enforcement roundups of illegal immigrants.
1
news
Fear and anxiety ripple through Western Pa. communities amid immigration crackdown
Pittsburgh Mayor Ed Gainey spoke Monday to members of the Pennsylvania Press Club in Harrisburg.
2
news
Pittsburgh Mayor Ed Gainey says his administration will not work with ICE
Pittsburgh Steelers owner Art Rooney II walks around the field before an NFL football game between the Denver Broncos and the Pittsburgh Steelers, Sunday, Sept. 15, 2024, in Denver.
3
sports
Art Rooney II gives Mike Tomlin vote of confidence, admits Steelers unlikely to re-sign both QBs
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Justin Fields is greeted by Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Russell Wilson after scoring a touchdown against the Los Angeles Chargers at the Acrisure Stadium on Sunday, Sept. 22, 2024, in the North Shore. The Pittsburgh Steelers won 20-10.
4
sports
Gerry Dulac: Steelers want a streamlined QB style, so who fits the bill?
Pittsburgh helmets on the sidelines during an NCAA college football game against North Carolina in Chapel Hill, N.C., Saturday, Oct. 29, 2022.
5
sports
ACC reveals full 2025 conference schedule for Pitt football
Advertisement
LATEST opinion
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story