Monday, February 24, 2025, 11:39AM |  35°
MENU
Advertisement
Workers set up voting machines in the North Side in 2016.
1
MORE

Sides clash over who decides whether Allegheny County gets new voting machines

Darrell Sapp/Post-Gazette

Sides clash over who decides whether Allegheny County gets new voting machines

An activist group that wants Allegheny County to replace electronic voting machines it says are vulnerable to hacking squared off in Commonwealth Court on Wednesday with county lawyers who say the group's proposed ordinance violates the law.

OpenPittsburgh and several other plaintiffs had appealed a ruling by Common Pleas Judge Joseph James, who sided with the county in rejecting the ordinance proposed last year.

The proposal would create a review commission to recommend replacement machines that would leave a paper trail backup in case the system is hacked. The ordinance would require Allegheny County Council to place the issue before the voters for a referendum to pay for new machines.

Advertisement

But the solicitor's office maintains that the proposed ordinance violates state law, which bars voters from determining which machines to buy. That decision, the solicitor's office said, is up to the Board of Elections.

Now Commonwealth Court will decide. The full panel heard arguments on the case at the City-County Building but didn't rule.

Ron Hicks, a lawyer for OpenPittsburgh, said his review of the law indicates that county council has the ability to place the issue before voters. He said the review commission would make a recommendation to county council, which would then put the issue on the ballot.

"It's the electorate that decides what voting machines to use," he said.

Advertisement

George Janocsko, first assistant solicitor, countered that the proposal violates state law and the county's home rule charter because it mandates the county to place the issue on the ballot.

"This would have to be advisory," he said of the review commission's recommendation for machines.

Mr. Hicks asked the court to reverse Judge James and send the proposal to county council to vote on it.

The appellate court will rule at a later date.

First Published: October 17, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

RELATED
Comments Disabled For This Story
Partners
Advertisement
Protesters gathered at the corner of Murray and Forbes avenues to speak out against the Trump administration's policies on Sunday, Feb. 23, 2025, in Squirrel Hill.
1
news
‘We will fight back’: Hundreds rally in Squirrel Hill in opposition of Trump, Musk and president’s administration
This undated photo provided by the Denver Police Department shows Andrew Duarte who served as a Denver police officer from 2017 to 2022.
2
news
Officer killed in York hospital shootout was PennWest California graduate
Texas wide receiver Matthew Golden catches a pass against Ohio State during the second half of the Cotton Bowl College Football Playoff semifinal game, Friday, Jan. 10, 2025, in Arlington, Texas.
3
sports
Which positions are strong and weak at NFL combine? And how will Steelers approach this draft?
Texas Rangers starting pitcher Andrew Heaney throws against the Seattle Mariners during the first inning of a baseball game Sunday, Sept. 15, 2024, in Seattle. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)
4
sports
Jason Mackey: Why the Andrew Heaney signing makes sense and what it could mean for the Pirates
Mississippi defensive tackle Walter Nolen (2) reacts after a sack against Wake Fores during the first half of an NCAA college football game in Winston-Salem, N.C., Saturday, Sept. 14, 2024.
5
sports
Steelers NFL draft big board: Best fits on defensive line
Workers set up voting machines in the North Side in 2016.  (Darrell Sapp/Post-Gazette)
Darrell Sapp/Post-Gazette
Advertisement
LATEST news
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story