Sunday, February 23, 2025, 10:42AM |  27°
MENU
Advertisement
This April 5, 2020, photo shows an envelope containing a 2020 census letter mailed to a U.S. resident in Detroit.
1
MORE

Other Voices: Prison gerrymandering in Pennsylvania must be addressed

Paul Sancya/Associated Press

Other Voices: Prison gerrymandering in Pennsylvania must be addressed

The League of Women Voters has been an active voice for fair redistricting here in Pennsylvania for over 30 years. As the Legislative Reapportionment Commission (LRC) begins hearings in preparation for Census Bureau release of data, we join other organizations in asking attention to an essential element in creating fair maps: counting incarcerated persons in their home communities.

While the Census Bureau counts incarcerated persons in their places of incarceration, the League of Women Voters recently joined 34 other Pennsylvania organizing groups in a letter to commission members asking the LRC to adjust that count and reallocate census data to home communities to ensure a more accurate, equitable count.

Counting temporarily incarcerated Pennsylvanians in the districts where they are temporarily held violates Pennsylvania law, which is clear that an incarcerated individual shall be deemed to reside where the individual was last registered to vote or at his last known address before being confined. Many in Pennsylvania jails and state prisons are still eligible to vote, yet can’t do so where they are confined, so it is obvious that they should not be counted there either.

Advertisement

The count also conflicts with the long-established legal principle that incarceration does not automatically change a person’s residence. More importantly, it runs counter to the principle of “one person, one vote,” which holds that election districts be composed of roughly the same number of constituents so that every person receives the same level of representation.

One result of this practice is that, while the elected officials in the communities housing their prison are technically supposed to represent them, these temporarily incarcerated Pennsylvanians will most often have to call on the elected officials from their home communities for constituent services. This creates a dynamic that is unfair for both residents and elected officials.

Another result of prison gerrymandering is that our district maps inflate the population count, and thus, the political influence, of the districts where prisons and jails are located. As a result, the voting power of everyone living outside of those districts is weakened.

Nationally, the League has been speaking out to end prison gerrymandering for the past decade, and state Leagues have been instrumental in legislation to end the practice in the 11 states that have addressed this legislatively.

Advertisement

Our neighboring states — New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia — have all passed legislation to correct this.

Like other redistricting reforms that have garnered strong public support, bills to do the same here in Pennsylvania were never considered in committee.

When the Legislature fails to act, citizens look to the courts. The League filed a redistricting lawsuit in 2018 that yielded new congressional maps. The suit also provided new legal precedent supporting a roadmap to end the miscount of incarcerated people here in Pennsylvania. Specifically, Article II, Section 16 of the Pennsylvania Constitution requires districts that are “as nearly equal in population as practicable.” In 2018, the state Supreme Court found that this provision requires Pennsylvania legislative districts to “accord equal weight to the votes of residents in each of the various districts.” Because temporarily incarcerated Pennsylvanians are, by law and legal precedent, “residents” of their home districts, they should be counted in those home districts, not where they are incarcerated.

The court also clarified the intent of the free and equal elections clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution (Article I, Section 5), stating that “any legislative scheme which has the effect of impermissibly diluting the potency of an individual’s vote for candidates for elective office relative to that of other voters will violate the guarantee of ‘free and equal’ elections afford by Article I, Section 5.”

Maps drawn by counting temporarily incarcerated Pennsylvanians in their prison districts inappropriately shift political power to those districts and dilute the individual vote in other legislative districts across the state that the temporarily incarcerated Pennsylvanians call home.

In recent public hearings the LRC heard from expert witnesses and from impacted individuals who clarified key issues:

• The LRC has the legal authority and moral responsibility to adjust prison data.

• Corrected data is available for use and would not create undue delay in the redistricting process.

• Adjustment of data would have no financial impact on prison towns and communities.

This is a pressing issue tied inextricably with the growth of mass incarceration. We believe it is not possible to create districts that truly represent Pennsylvania counties, constituents and communities without correcting the count of state prison populations. We ask the LRC to address this quickly and prepare for use of adjusted data.

Terrie Griffin is the president of the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania.

First Published: August 22, 2021, 4:00 a.m.

RELATED
SHOW COMMENTS (7)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
The University of Pittsburgh's Cathedral of Learning
1
business
Amid funding uncertainty, Pitt pauses doctoral admissions
Pirates outfielder DJ Stewart gets congratulations from teammates after his home run against the Baltimore Orioles in the first game of the Grapefruit League season at Ed Smith Stadium in Sarasota, Fla., on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
2
sports
5 takeaways from Pirates' spring training victory over Orioles
A new report advises retirees in 2025 to aim for just 3.7% when withdrawing from savings -- down from 4%. Over a 30-year retirement, that could mean the difference between financial security or outliving your cash in your 80s or 90s, financial experts say.
3
business
How much can retirees safely withdraw from their nest eggs? Financial experts weigh in.
York County District Attorney Timothy J. Barker reacts during a news conference regarding the shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York, Pa. on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
4
news
Police officer killed, gunman dead in shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York
Preston Coleman, 52, was beaten and strangled inside an Aliquippa VFW on Jan. 5, 2025, in what police described as a vicious, unprovoked attack.
5
news
Bartender working at Aliquippa VFW during beating that left man unconscious facing charges
This April 5, 2020, photo shows an envelope containing a 2020 census letter mailed to a U.S. resident in Detroit.  (Paul Sancya/Associated Press)
Paul Sancya/Associated Press
Advertisement
LATEST opinion
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story