Wednesday, February 19, 2025, 2:43PM |  14°
MENU
Advertisement
Vot­ers cast their bal­lots at the old Stone School, used as a poll­ing sta­tion, on elec­tion day in Hills­boro, Va., on Tues­day.
1
MORE

Jim Nowlan: Election reveals there is space for third political party

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

Jim Nowlan: Election reveals there is space for third political party

If the 2020 presidential election tells us anything, it’s that there appears to be space for a major new political party.

Exceptions abound, but generally speaking, minorities and urban liberal white voters are comfortable with the Democratic Party. Rural voters are simpatico with Donald Trump’s brand of Republicanism. That leaves many people across the great swath of suburbia who appear comfortable with neither.

First, some background on the travails of third-party efforts, according to this broken-down professor of American politics.

Advertisement

The last time a new party supplanted one of the two major parties was in the 1850s, when Abraham Lincoln and like-minded activists in Illinois and Wisconsin created the new Republican Party, pushing aside the feckless Whig Party, which dithered on the issue of slavery.

A handful of passionate Republicans rallied the public in the North with the clarion call that extension of slavery into their midst — as OK’d by the Dred Scott decision of 1857 — must be blocked at all costs. Support spread like wildfire across the prairie. In less than a decade, the Republican Party, still enlisting but a minority of voters, captured the White House.

None of the scores of third parties attempted since has been able to replicate that feat. There are several reasons. In our “first past the post” system, where there is only one winner, it is hard for a small new party to gain enough traction to win anything.

In 1979-80, for example, I organized the presidential campaign of Illinois U.S. Rep. John Anderson, who shifted from a Republican to Independent candidacy in the spring of 1980. By the summer, polls showed Anderson with more than 20% of voter support. But when voters realized he could not win, they defaulted to support one of the two major party candidates who could, and Ronald Reagan won the presidency.

Advertisement

Third parties must convince voters they can win at least some offices. Further, one or both of the two major parties must falter and be vulnerable.

A third party that focused initial efforts in the suburbs could conceivably win some local state legislative and congressional seats, which could become a base from which to build.

Another problem for third parties is that they are either somewhat radical and thus not widely attractive, or they are moderate — I hear lots of people saying we need a moderate party. But such parties are, well, moderate and bland, and thus fail to arouse the passions necessary to build a party.

As for my suburban-based party, I sense voters there tend to be college educated, tolerant of diverse lifestyles, concerned about government overspending and worried about national economic and social decline. They simply want order, harmony and prosperity.

So, what kind of platform might arouse passions among these voters? Alas, here is another problem for a nascent party: The new party concept sounds good so long as it trumpets “my” values and objectives. In other words, each of us has our own unique take on what we would like in a platform. Only if “my” platform coincides with that of a broad swath of the public will it be successful.

Let me try my platform out on you. I call myself a member of The PARTY (the Party of Accountability and Responsibility for The Young). Hokey? Maybe, but the platform planks would include, among others:

• Increased investment in university and career education;

• A national industrial and technology policy — not government-directed but supported, like Lincoln’s land-grant universities and the old agricultural extension research, so as to compete more effectively with China and Asia;

• A plan to reduce the debt burden on our grandchildren, which will take sacrifice;

• Environment action to drive toward a sustainable climate for our grandchildren;

• Social policy that focuses on rebuilding depleted cultures within many rural and urban neighborhoods, rather than simply to spray more money on the problems from the top down;

• Pro-choice yet also pro-reduction, even working with pro-life groups, that is, joint efforts to reduce abortions.

I feel many of my suburban voter base (obviously not limited to suburbanites) consider that America has become fat, sloppy and dependent on government (maybe that’s too harsh), and that we need to hark back to the now-hackneyed yet pertinent John Kennedy exhortation: Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.

In other words, let’s get our act together as a nation. It won’t be easy but, hey, it’s about our grandkids. My platform may differ from yours. So, what might be better, stronger — and appeal broadly and generate passion? That is the challenge.

I do see the space out there for a new party. I believe a conversation on the topic is warranted and, indeed, important.

Jim Nowlan is a retired professor of American politics and co-author of “Fixing Illinois.” In the 1970s, he managed campaigns for moderate Republican U.S. Senate and presidential candidates. This first appeared in The Chicago Triune.

First Published: November 7, 2020, 9:30 a.m.

RELATED
SHOW COMMENTS (0)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
President Donald Trump listens as Elon Musk speaks in the Oval Office at the White House, Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025, in Washington. (Photo/Alex Brandon)
1
news
McCormick on board with Trump, DOGE shakeup while Fetterman blasts ‘chaos, confusion’
Mt. Lebanon's Kim Seaver (back row, right) was a member of the Post-Gazette Fabulous 5 girls basketball all-star team in 1996. Other players are (from front left) Monessen's Gina Naccarato, Penn Hills' LynnDee Howell, McKeesport's Swin Cash and (front right) Mount Pleasant's Michelle Katkowski.
2
sports
Mike White's Prep Talk: Basketball stars of yesteryear have sons and daughters in WPIAL quarterfinals
Gov. Josh Shapiro is joined in the broadcast booth by Curtis Aiken before the start of Pitt-Syracuse on Tuesday night at Petersen Events Center.
3
sports
Gov. Josh Shapiro aims to make Pennsylvania 'compete' in NIL, bring 'stability' to transfer portal
The WPIAL basketball playoffs are underway.
4
sports
WPIAL boys basketball playoffs: Down go the Highlanders, all the way out of PIAA playoffs
Former detainee Marc Fogel stands with a U.S. flag around his neck as he is welcomed to the White House after he was freed from Russia in Washington, DC, on February 11, 2025. Fogel, a US teacher detained in Russia since 2021 on drugs charges, was released February 11 after an "exchange" with Moscow, the White House. Trump said he hoped Fogel's release could mark the start of fresh ties with Moscow to end the Ukraine war.
5
news
Marc Fogel returns to Pittsburgh after release from Russian custody and medical evaluation
Vot­ers cast their bal­lots at the old Stone School, used as a poll­ing sta­tion, on elec­tion day in Hills­boro, Va., on Tues­day.  (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)
Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images
Advertisement
LATEST opinion
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story