Saturday, January 18, 2025, 10:25AM |  29°
MENU
Advertisement
Attorney General William Barr speaks about the release of the redacted version of the Mueller report on April 18.
1
MORE

Andrew C. McCarthy: No obstruction on the facts of the case

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Andrew C. McCarthy: No obstruction on the facts of the case

Understanding the disagreement between William Barr and Robert Mueller

The most interesting new disclosure to come out of Attorney General William Barr’s press conference on the Mueller report was about obstruction of justice.

The attorney general stated that the special counsel evaluated 10 incidents with an eye toward whether they amounted to an obstruction offense. Mr. Barr elaborated that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein disagreed with Mr. Mueller on whether these incidents even could have amounted to obstruction as a matter of law.

It is important to grasp what that means, and what it doesn’t, because I’ve heard some inaccurate commentary. Mr. Barr was not saying that Mr. Mueller found one or more of these incidents to constitute obstruction; Mr. Mueller was saying that the incidents involved actions that could theoretically have amounted to obstruction.

Advertisement

A concrete example may make this easier to grasp: the firing of FBI director James Comey. Before a prosecutor considered evidence regarding that incident, there would be a preliminary question: Could the president’s dismissal of an FBI director amount to an obstruction offense as a matter of law? If prosecutors were to decide that, even if the evidence showed corrupt intent on the part of the president, a president’s firing of the FBI director cannot constitutionally amount to an obstruction crime, then the prosecutors would not bother to investigate and make an assessment of the evidence.

The release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report has raised new questions about the conduct of President Donald Trump.
Kathryn Cramer Brownell
Kathryn Cramer Brownell: The key to Trump’s fate is not the Mueller report

What Mr. Barr is saying is that he and Mr. Mueller did not agree, with respect to all 10 incidents, on whether the incident could legally amount to obstruction. What the attorney general therefore did was assume, for argument’s sake, that Mr. Mueller was correct on the law (i.e., that the incident could theoretically amount to obstruction), and then move on to the second phase of the analysis: Assuming this could be an obstruction offense as a matter of law, could we prove obstruction as a matter of fact? This requires an assessment of whether the evidence of each element of an obstruction offense — most significantly, corrupt intent — could be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

That is why Mr. Barr laid out the facts that the president could have shut down the investigation but did not; that he could have asserted executive privilege to withhold information from the investigation, but instead made numerous witnesses and well over a million documents available to the special counsel; and that — reportedly according to Mr. Mueller — the president sincerely felt frustrated that the investigation was unfairly undermining his presidency. The point is that these facts so cut against the idea of corruptly impeding an investigation that it is inconceivable the prosecutor could prove an obstruction case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Go to section

Advertisement

A final thought on this. The problem we have when a prosecutor makes a decision that implicates politics is that an unreal standard is imposed. For a prosecutor, there is either enough evidence of a crime or there is not. There is no gray area in between. But in reality, there is more gray area than anything else. The fact that no crime is found does not mean the underlying conduct merits our endorsement. It is commonsense that we can conclude the president did not handle each of the 10 incidents in a way we find admirable, and at the same time agree that the president’s conduct was not felonious.

Commonsense is in short supply, though.

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and a contributing editor of National Review.

First Published: April 19, 2019, 9:00 a.m.

RELATED
The report by Special Counsel Robert Mueller recounts a series of unseemly and possibly illegal actions taken by President Donald Trump.
David Brooks
David Brooks: It’s not the collusion, it’s the corruption
Attorney General William Barr speaks about the release of a redacted version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report during a news conference on April 18 in Washington.
the Editorial Board
Takeaways from the Mueller report
SHOW COMMENTS (0)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
Quarterback Kenny Pickett, left, the Pittsburgh Steelers first-round NFL football draft pick, poses for a photo with president/owner Art Rooney II at the team's training facility in Pittsburgh, Friday, April 29, 2022.
1
sports
Joe Starkey: Steelers offense in disrepair thanks to series of misguided, arrogant decisions
Boston Red Sox relief pitcher Chase Shugart gets a new ball after giving up a three-run home run to Chicago White Sox's Andrew Benintendi during the seventh inning of a baseball game, Saturday, Sept. 7, 2024, in Boston.
2
sports
Pirates acquire right-hander Chase Shugart in trade with Red Sox
Pittsburgh Penguins goaltender Alex Nedeljkovic, center, celebrates with teammates after scoring during the third period of an NHL hockey game against the Buffalo Sabres, Friday, Jan. 17, 2025, in Buffalo, N.Y. (AP Photo/Jeffrey T. Barnes)
3
sports
Inside Alex Nedeljkovic’s historic night and more takeaways from a wild Penguins win in Buffalo
Ice on the Allegheny River in Downtown on Tuesday, Jan.14, 2025. Pittsburgh is forecast to see extreme cold weather next week, with wind chills of 25 degrees below zero possible.
4
news
Pittsburgh is under an extreme cold watch. Here's what that means and what to expect.
U.S. Steel Clairton Mill Works in Clairton earlier this month.
5
business
'There is no agreement': Cleveland-Cliffs, USW deny scheming to foil U.S. Steel deal with Nippon
Attorney General William Barr speaks about the release of the redacted version of the Mueller report on April 18.  (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Win McNamee/Getty Images
Advertisement
LATEST opinion
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story