Wednesday, March 26, 2025, 1:53PM |  36°
MENU
Advertisement
1
MORE

Trust the facts on GMOs

Getty Images/iStockphoto

Trust the facts on GMOs

There’s no need for the USDA to put upbeat spin on labels

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has come up with cheerful new labels for genetically modified foods. The bright green and yellow circles depict a happy sun, a winking smiley face or a verdant landscape stamped with the letters “BE,” for “bioengineered” — rather than the familiar “genetically modified” or “genetically engineered.”

It’s a shame the government is unwilling to let the facts speak for themselves.

Science has affirmed that GM foods — grown from seeds whose genes have been altered to make them resistant to insects or herbicides, for instance — are safe. There’s no need to dress up the labels to suggest that genetic modification makes foods somehow better. That risks misleading the public, just as Greenpeace and other groups have done with their baseless claims that GM crops are dangerous.

Advertisement

A straightforward description, not propaganda, is what American consumers want. And new evidence suggests that plain labels can help build acceptance for GM foods.

Economists who looked at prevailing attitudes in Vermont before and after a state labeling requirement went into effect there in July 2016 have found that the state’s no-nonsense labels — no logos, just the words “produced with genetic engineering” or “partially produced with genetic engineering” — led to a 19 percent drop in opposition to GM foods.

Views shifted abruptly in Vermont even as general distrust of GM foods continued its steady rise everywhere else in the U.S. Earlier research had suggested that food labels give consumers a greater sense of control, and Vermont seems to bear this out. One thing’s for sure: Straightforward labels didn’t scare people, as some food makers and scientists had feared they might.

The Vermont requirement was short-lived, because a federal labeling law pre-empting state rules was passed soon after it came into effect. Public comment on the proposed national labels is open until Tuesday.

Advertisement

USDA officials should pay attention to the new evidence from Vermont and simplify their labels to convey information, not spin. Once they’re in use, more Americans will come to accept that GM foods are safe.

First Published: July 2, 2018, 4:00 a.m.

RELATED
SHOW COMMENTS (0)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
The Cathedral of Learning, centerpiece of the University of Pittsburgh campus
1
business
Three more Pitt researchers lose NIH funding
Marlene Siesielski, a volunteer for Veterans Leadership Program, loads boxes of food into a vehicle near the organizations Strip District offices on Monday, Sept. 13, 2021.
2
news
Gov. Josh Shapiro demands Trump rescind $13M funding cuts affecting Pennsylvania food banks
A file photo of the Pennsylvania Capitol in Harrisburg, where the state House on Tuesday passed four bills intended to enshrine basic provisions of the federal Affordable Care Act into state law.
3
news
Pa. House passes bills that would put some Obamacare provisions in state law
Pirates outfielder Jack Suwinski hits against the Twins at LECOM Park in Bradenton, Florida, on Sunday, Feb. 23, 2025.
4
sports
Jason Mackey: The biggest source of offensive improvement for the Pirates in 2025 may surprise you
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Russell Wilson (3) talks to New York Giants linebacker Brian Burns (0) after an NFL football game, Monday, Oct. 28, 2024, in Pittsburgh.
5
sports
Former Steelers quarterback Russell Wilson heading to the Giants
 (Getty Images/iStockphoto)
Getty Images/iStockphoto
Advertisement
LATEST opinion
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story