Sunday, February 23, 2025, 9:23AM |  27°
MENU
Advertisement
This Oct. 19, 2017, file photo shows a new voting machine which prints a paper record on display at a polling site in Conyers, Ga.
1
MORE

Citing election security, advocates seek to force Pa. to re-examine new voting machines

David Goldman/AP

Citing election security, advocates seek to force Pa. to re-examine new voting machines

Organized by election-security advocates, 200 Pennsylvania voters filed a petition Tuesday seeking to force the Pennsylvania Department of State to reconsider its approval of a touchscreen voting machine selected by Philadelphia and other counties.

Those machines, the ExpressVote XL from election mega-vendor Election Systems & Software (ES&S), have security flaws and do not comply with the state Election Code, the voters say in their petition submitted by certified mail and email Tuesday. It was signed by voters from Allegheny, Bucks, Delaware, Montgomery, Northampton, Philadelphia, and Westmoreland counties.

The law gives voters authority to trigger a new state review of previously certified electronic voting machines.

Advertisement

The petitioners lay out a number of concerns, including the possibility of attackers’ altering votes; ballot secrecy being violated by comparing the chronological stack of ballots to poll books; poll workers inadvertently seeing voters’ choices while helping them; and lack of accessibility for voters with disabilities. They also point to requirements in the Election Code that they say the machine does not meet, such as not using colored paper to distinguish between political parties during a primary election.

An ES&S spokesperson rejected those contentions, saying the ExpressVote XL protects voters’ privacy, is accessible for voters with disabilities, and does not allow manipulation of ballots after they are cast.

The system “has been thoroughly tested and prove to be secure and accurate,” a spokesperson wrote in an email, and “ES&S stands behind the security of the ExpressVote XL 100 percent.”

The effort was led by Citizens for Better Elections and a group of activists, the Protect Our Vote Philly Coalition, which for months urged Philadelphia elections officials not to choose the ExpressVote XL. After city elections administrators chose the system, activists unsuccessfully called for the decision to be overturned. They also lobbied other counties, but ultimately decided they should go to the state, said Kevin Skoglund, chief technologist for Citizens for Better Elections and a leader in the effort to promote hand-marked paper ballots over electronic machines.

Advertisement

“At some point you realize that if the machine is not fit for use by these counties, then it’s not fit for use by any voter in Pennsylvania to be voting on,” Skoglund said Tuesday afternoon. “These problems are severe.”

Skoglund said that advocates have spoken in recent months with officials at the Department of State, including Acting Secretary Kathy Boockvar, but that eventually they felt they needed to file the legal petition.

A spokesperson for the department did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

All 67 counties in the state are purchasing new voting machines — a handful already have done so — at the order of Gov. Tom Wolf. For years, most voters in the state used systems that did not leave an auditable paper trail. Wolf’s mandate requires all machines in the state to have voter-verifiable paper trails that can be audited and manually recounted, which security experts say is more secure.

But Skoglund and the other voters say the ExpressVote XL is not as secure as hand-marked paper ballots, which voters manually fill out and scan.

To be used by Pennsylvania voters, voting machines must go through federal and then state certification. If a reexamination of the ExpressVote XL leads to decertification of the machine, as the voters and advocates hope, counties would be forced to choose other systems.

In counties that already have chosen the system, including Philly, that would set off a scramble to reselect machines in time for the 2020 presidential election.

First Published: July 17, 2019, 12:13 p.m.

RELATED
SHOW COMMENTS (0)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
The University of Pittsburgh's Cathedral of Learning
1
business
Amid funding uncertainty, Pitt pauses doctoral admissions
Pirates outfielder DJ Stewart gets congratulations from teammates after his home run against the Baltimore Orioles in the first game of the Grapefruit League season at Ed Smith Stadium in Sarasota, Fla., on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
2
sports
5 takeaways from Pirates' spring training victory over Orioles
York County District Attorney Timothy J. Barker reacts during a news conference regarding the shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York, Pa. on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025.
3
news
Police officer killed, gunman dead in shooting at UPMC Memorial Hospital in York
A new report advises retirees in 2025 to aim for just 3.7% when withdrawing from savings -- down from 4%. Over a 30-year retirement, that could mean the difference between financial security or outliving your cash in your 80s or 90s, financial experts say.
4
business
How much can retirees safely withdraw from their nest eggs? Financial experts weigh in.
Preston Coleman, 52, was beaten and strangled inside an Aliquippa VFW on Jan. 5, 2025, in what police described as a vicious, unprovoked attack.
5
news
Bartender working at Aliquippa VFW during beating that left man unconscious facing charges
This Oct. 19, 2017, file photo shows a new voting machine which prints a paper record on display at a polling site in Conyers, Ga.  (David Goldman/AP)
David Goldman/AP
Advertisement
LATEST news
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story