Wednesday, January 29, 2025, 9:37PM |  44°
MENU
SECTIONS
OTHER
CLASSIFIEDS
CONTACT US / FAQ
Advertisement
Students exit a polling station on the University of Alabama at Birmingham campus in Birmingham, Ala., Dec. 12, 2017.
2
MORE

Supreme Court rules in favor of Black Alabama voters in unexpected defense of Voting Rights Act

New York Times

Supreme Court rules in favor of Black Alabama voters in unexpected defense of Voting Rights Act

The Supreme Court has issued a surprising ruling in favor of Black voters in a congressional redistricting case, ordering the creation of a second district with a large Black population

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a surprising 5-4 ruling in favor of Black voters in a congressional redistricting case from Alabama, with two conservative justices joining liberals in rejecting a Republican-led effort to weaken a landmark voting rights law.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh aligned with the court's liberals in affirming a lower-court ruling that found a likely violation of the Voting Rights Act in an Alabama congressional map with one majority Black seat out of seven congressional districts in a state where more than one in four residents is Black. The state now will have to draw a new map for next year's elections.

The decision was closely watched for its potential effect on control of the closely divided U.S. House of Representatives. Because of the ruling, new maps are likely in Alabama and Louisiana that could allow Democratic-leaning Black voters to elect their preferred candidates in two more congressional districts.

Advertisement

The outcome was unexpected in that the court had allowed the challenged Alabama map to be used for the 2022 elections, and in arguments last October the justices appeared willing to make it harder to challenge redistricting plans as racially discriminatory under the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

FILE - Demonstrators stand outside of the U.S. Supreme Court, as the court hears arguments over the Indian Child Welfare Act on Nov. 9, 2022, in Washington. The Supreme Court has preserved the system that gives preference to Native American families in foster care and adoption proceedings of Native children. The court left in place the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, which was enacted to address concerns that Native children were being separated from their families and, too frequently, placed in non-Native homes.
Mark Sherman
Supreme Court preserves law that aims to keep Native American children with tribal families

The chief justice himself suggested last year that he was open to changes in the way courts weigh discrimination claims under the part of the law known as section 2. But on Thursday, Roberts wrote that the court was declining “to recast our section 2 case law as Alabama requests.”

Jusrice Roberts also was part of conservative high-court majorities in earlier cases that made it harder for racial minorities to use the Voting Rights Act in ideologically divided rulings in 2013 and 2021.

The other four conservative justices dissented Thursday. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the decision forces “Alabama to intentionally redraw its longstanding congressional districts so that black voters can control a number of seats roughly proportional to the black share of the State’s population. Section 2 demands no such thing, and, if it did, the Constitution would not permit it.”

Advertisement

The Biden administration sided with the Black voters in Alabama.

Attorney General Merrick Garland applauded the ruling: “Today’s decision rejects efforts to further erode fundamental voting rights protections, and preserves the principle that in the United States, all eligible voters must be able to exercise their constitutional right to vote free from discrimination based on their race."

Evan Milligan, a Black voter and the lead plaintiff in the case, said the ruling was a victory for democracy and people of color.

"We are grateful that the Supreme Court upheld what we knew to be true: that everyone deserves to have their vote matter and their voice heard. Today is a win for democracy and freedom not just in Alabama but across the United States,” Mr. Milligan said.

FILE - People wait in line outside the Supreme Court in Washington to listen to oral arguments in a voting rights case on Feb. 27, 2013. A U.S. Supreme Court decision a decade ago that tossed out the heart of the Voting Rights Act continues to reverberate across the country. Republican-led states continue to pass voting restrictions that, in several cases, would have been subject to federal review had the court left the provision intact.
Christina A. Cassidy And Ayanna Alexander
Supreme Court tossed out heart of Voting Rights Act a decade ago, prompting wave of new voting rules

Alabama Republican Party Chairman John Wahl said in a statement that state lawmakers would comply with the ruling. “Regardless of our disagreement with the Court’s decision, we are confident the Alabama Legislature will redraw district lines that ensure the people of Alabama are represented by members who share their beliefs, while following the requirements of applicable law,” Mr. Wahl said.

The case stems from challenges to Alabama’s seven-district congressional map, which included one district in which Black voters form a large enough majority that they have the power to elect their preferred candidate. The challengers said that one district is not enough, pointing out that overall, Alabama’s population is more than 25% Black.

A three-judge court, with two appointees of former President Donald Trump, had little trouble concluding that the plan likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the votes of Black Alabamians. The panel ordered a new map drawn.

But the state quickly appealed to the Supreme Court, where five conservative justices prevented the lower-court ruling from going forward. At the same time, the court decided to hear the Alabama case.

Louisiana’s congressional map had separately been identified as probably discriminatory by a lower court. That map, too, remained in effect last year and now will have to be redrawn.

The National Redistricting Foundation said in a statement that its pending lawsuits in Georgia and Texas also could be affected.

Separately, the Supreme Court in the fall will hear South Carolina's appeal of a lower-court ruling that found Republican lawmakers stripped Black voters from a district to make it safer for a Republican candidate. That case also could lead to a redrawn map in South Carolina, where six U.S. House members are Republicans and one is a Democrat.

Partisan politics also underlies the Alabama case. Republicans who dominate elective office in Alabama have been resistant to creating a second district with a Democratic-leaning Black majority, or close to one, that could send another Democrat to Congress.

The judges found that Alabama concentrated Black voters in one district, while spreading them out among the others to make it much more difficult to elect more than one candidate of their choice.

Alabama’s Black population is large enough and geographically compact enough to create a second district, the judges found.

Denying discrimination, Alabama argued that the lower court ruling would have forced it to sort voters by race and insisted it was taking a “race neutral” approach to redistricting.

At arguments in October, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson scoffed at the idea that race could not be part of the equation. Justice Jackson, the court’s first Black woman, said that constitutional amendments passed after the Civil War and the Voting Rights Act a century later were intended to do the same thing, make Black Americans “equal to white citizens.”

First Published: June 8, 2023, 3:15 p.m.

RELATED
Rep. James E. Clyburn, D-S.C., nominates Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., for House speaker on Jan. 6. The Supreme Court on Monday said it will consider South Carolina’s attempt to reinstate a congressional redistricting plan that a lower court found had “exiled” 30,000 Black voters to create a district safer for a White Republican candidate.
Robert Barnes
Supreme Court to consider South Carolina plan that ‘exiled’ Black voters
SHOW COMMENTS (12)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
Pittsburgh Steelers running back Najee Harris (22) walks off the field after losing to the Baltimore Ravens at M&T Bank Stadium on Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025, in Baltimore, Maryland. The Baltimore Ravens won 28-14.
1
sports
Steelers still have the NFL’s highest-paid defense and lowest-paid offense — and that's unlikely to change
Former Rep. Sean Duffy, R-Wis., testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington on Jan. 15, 2025, during a Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing on his nomination to be U.S. secretary of transportation.
2
news
Newly sworn-in U.S. transportation chief orders fuel economy rule rewrite
Pirates second baseman Adam Frazier acknowledges the crowd after being introduced as the starting second baseman for the National League in the All-Star game Thursday, July 1, 2021, at PNC Park.
3
sports
Analysis: What will Adam Frazier bring to the Pirates — and could they have done better?
U.S. Sen. Dave McCormick slammed Mayor Ed Gainey's refusal to cooperate with federal immigration agents in a growing battle between Republicans in Washington and local Democratic officials over President Donald Trump's hardline deportation policies.
4
news
McCormick presses Gainey to ‘follow the law’ as Trump deportation plans play out
Pittsburgh Penguins head coach Mike Sullivan, standing, reacts behind players on the bench during the third period of an NHL hockey game against the San Jose Sharks in San Jose, Calif., Monday, Jan. 27, 2025.
5
sports
Joe Starkey: Penguins must do what Steelers will not — tear it up and embrace life at the bottom
Students exit a polling station on the University of Alabama at Birmingham campus in Birmingham, Ala., Dec. 12, 2017.  (New York Times)
Voters stand in long lines waiting to cast their vote on Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2020, in Auburn, Ala. (AP Photo/Butch Dill)  (Butch Dill)
New York Times
Advertisement
LATEST news
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story