Friday, February 28, 2025, 2:03AM |  42°
MENU
SECTIONS
OTHER
CLASSIFIEDS
CONTACT US / FAQ
Advertisement
This July 27, 2009, file photo shows the Pennsylvania Judicial Center shortly after its completion in Harrisburg, Pa. The fate of a constitutional amendment for victims' rights that Pennsylvania voters apparently approved overwhelmingly nearly two years ago is about to go before the state's highest court.
1
MORE

Pa. justices ponder Marsy’s Law, victim rights amendment that’s been in limbo

Carolyn Kaster/AP

Pa. justices ponder Marsy’s Law, victim rights amendment that’s been in limbo

HARRISBURG — Questions about the legality and practical effect of a victims’ rights amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution that has been in limbo for almost two years dominated oral arguments in the state Supreme Court on Tuesday.

The justices could act to put the ballot question into the constitution, upholding unofficial tallies that showed it being approved in 2019 by a ratio of 3 to 1, or could kill it because it bundled together various provisions that opponents say are insufficiently related.

The amendment spells out 15 rights for victims, including notification about their cases and the right to attend and weigh in during plea hearings, sentencings and parole proceedings. It also spells out rights about recovering property and the ability to reject defense subpoenas and states the General Assembly can fine-tune victims’ rights.

Advertisement

David Pittinsky, a lawyer for the four voters seeking to overturn a lower court ruling that invalidated the referendum results earlier this year, said the so-called Marsy’s Law provisions are not disparate, telling the justices “every single one of these are to protect those rights.”

Pennsylvania Marsy’s Law Crime Victims Rights Amendment
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Pa. voters support Marsy's Law

The state Supreme Court ruled shortly before the November 2019 vote that election officials could not tabulate or certify the votes while litigation continued.

The case pits the League of Women Voters against the state’s top ranking elections official, acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid. Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration did not appeal the January lower-court decision.

Chief Justice Max Baer said the constitution’s requirement that amendments address a single topic is meant to prevent impermissible log-rolling, in which voters who favor one change find themselves forced to swallow elements they do not support to pass what they do want.

Advertisement

Asked why the 15 rights weren’t presented as individual amendments, Mr. Pittinsky said that was a matter of the Legislature’s discretion. Constitutional amendments have to pass both General Assembly chambers in two consecutive sessions before going to voters for final approval.

Justices also were interested in how the amendment will affect their broad power over court processes.

“This is saying to courts, you can’t really control these proceedings now in a manner you see fit,” said Justice Christine Donohue.

Mr. Pittinsky told the justices that future litigation might end up before them to “reconcile” the amendment’s elements with other court rules, and argued they should not nullify the referendum results over the prospect of a future case or controversy.

Pa. Supreme Court backs ruling to not count Marsy's Law votes
Paula Reed Ward
Pa. Supreme Court backs ruling to not count Marsy's Law votes

He also noted the state has a victims’ rights law already that provides some of the same protections.

Simply declaring that a group of changes all pertain to victims’ rights doesn’t make them related, argued American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania lawyer Mary Catherine Roper. She said the amendment’s explicit authority to let the General Assembly expound upon it “infringes on this court’s otherwise exclusive authority over court proceedings.”

Ms. Roper argued the amendment would require notice about hearings and other rights to a very broad group of people, those “affected by crimes and those alleged to have been affected,” using as an example a bar owner whose property sustained minor damaged in a crime. She said establishing a crime has occurred happens at the end of criminal proceedings, but the amendment establishes rights for victims that would be in effect before that takes place.

The state ACLU opposed the amendment before voters gave it their OK.

In throwing out the vote results in January, Commonwealth Court Judge Ellen Ceisler said the state constitution requires separate votes on distinct amendments, “and the proposed amendment fails to satisfy this mandate, disenfranchisement will occur if the electorate must vote on the proposed amendment as a unitary proposal.”

The four people who are seeking to have the referendum results counted and the amendment language go into force are crime victims or family members of a crime victim.

First Published: September 21, 2021, 1:28 p.m.
Updated: September 21, 2021, 4:11 p.m.

RELATED
Marsy's Law backers call on opponents to drop lawsuit in wake of strong voter support
Paula Reed Ward
Marsy's Law backers call on opponents to drop lawsuit in wake of strong voter support
SHOW COMMENTS (6)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
An example of a Real ID-compliant non-commercial driver's license in Pennsylvania.
1
news
The Real ID deadline is approaching. Here's what Pennsylvanians should know.
Pittsburgh Pirates pitcher Bubba Chandler delivers in the third inning of a spring training baseball game against the Minnesota Twins in Fort Myers, Fla., Thursday, Feb. 27, 2025.
2
sports
3 takeaways from Pirates’ lopsided spring training victory over Twins
FILE - Demonstrators protest Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) layoffs in front of the CDC headquarters in Atlanta, Feb. 18, 2025.
3
news
Judge finds mass firings of federal probationary workers to likely be unlawful
Pittsburgh Steelers owner Art Rooney II, left, and general manager Omar Khan stand on the field before an NFL football game between the Pittsburgh Steelers and the New York Giants, Monday, Oct. 28, 2024, in Pittsburgh.
4
sports
2025 NFL salary cap will rise to $279 million. Here's what that means for the Steelers
Pittsburgh Steelers coach Arthur Smith walks off the field after losing to the Baltimore Ravens at M&T Bank Stadium on Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025, in Baltimore, Maryland. The Baltimore Ravens won 28-14.
5
sports
Joe Starkey: Was Steelers GM Omar Khan kidding with his Arthur Smith comments?
This July 27, 2009, file photo shows the Pennsylvania Judicial Center shortly after its completion in Harrisburg, Pa. The fate of a constitutional amendment for victims' rights that Pennsylvania voters apparently approved overwhelmingly nearly two years ago is about to go before the state's highest court.  (Carolyn Kaster/AP)
Carolyn Kaster/AP
Advertisement
LATEST news
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story